INDIAN CORRUPTION MOVEMENT & CIVIL SOCIETY REPRESTATIVES?

Well at last govt' had decided to move ahead with talks over drafting the bill with Representatives of civil society irrespective to opposition campaign by few on list.It was dis heartening to see that many national medias covering the issue for days had not high lighted that history & opinion of all learned peoples reveals that impart of knowledge or transfer of knowledge by an individual to any is always a bonus & greeted irrespective of his past conduct or legal status.Induction to an individual to a Panel does not place him over justice or cease any authority to charge sheet him on objectionable causes.ON no cost it sets any wrong precedents by its induction because to frame a law u need a man of law .To decide a best out of club of lawyers is always arbitrary because no one can justify he does not looses cases in the courts.It is highly partial & non justified to demand new names to the Panel.It is Anna & team first sighted the cause & means to agitate against a motion & researched a way to compel govt' for the first time to accept his way of launching a bill.He commands stick & respect to induct peoples of his choices at the panel.It is funny to understand a discussion table does not constitute a bill.It has to be floated on the floor of the parliament.Every legend has the right to prove his might to influence the bill then & show his knowledge of constitution & sense of duty to serve the civil society.Influencing media & raising controversies to either derail the issue or shift the focus of the issue is cowardice act with no mission to serve the society.I know very well the bill alone is not going to serve much when implementing authorities are almost non trust worthy & ceases credibility yet there is no harm to begin from some where.IS there any one to sit on fast unto death to demand a change in the civil society panel?